Sure, but a perfectly tuned carb should be equivalent to a TBI in that regard. So if it's going to outperform port FI, it has to do it against that disadvantage from the start.
For the record, I had no plans or interest in getting into a carb vs EFI discussion and don't remember how it happened, I guess just as a tangent to whether single, 4 and 12 port injectors offer any difference in the completeness of the atomization and evaporation process. I still think probably no but a dyno can tell us for sure.
I've definitely heard/read it, I just havent every been interested in putting a carburetor on anything in the past 20 years so never paid much attention.
I did some googling but what I found that seemed truly apples to apples didn't come to the same conclusions.
This is what I came across that actually compared port EFI vs carb with the same manifold.
Inconclusive as the performance was very similar. They did bring up the charge cooling thing in the text
https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/carburetor-vs-fuel-injection-we-put-both-to-the-test-on-ls-engine/
EFI makes 20+ over carb
https://www.enginelabs.com/engine-t...-efi-carb-delete-n-a-race-engine-exposes-all/
Here's one where the carb makes more, but it's a carb on performance intakes against a completely different EFI intake.
The viscosity of air is so low there's hardly any difference in the frictional losses in a temperature change of this magnitude (we're talking ballpark, 25-30°F drop) and a duct this short - It's about a 5% change in viscosity but it's 5% of a couple of thousandths of a psi. Losses in runs of HVAC duct work are expressed in usually single digit inches of water column, which is 1/27th of a psi.
As I've researched my response to this I've come across no shortage of claims that the carb cools the charge more because of the reasons discussed here, and I don't disagree...if you take a charge temperature measurement in the manifold then yes, it's going to be cooler on the carb'd engine than the EFI because you're measuring it after the fuel has cooled it, vs before. My argument is simply that the cooling affect is of equal magnitude, it just happens as it enters the cylinder instead of before it goes down the runner. It's not an easy thing to confirm though, unless you drill a hole somewhere and place a temp sensor inside the cylinder without it being smashed by the piston, and have it actually respond quick enough to get a reading at the right instant in a process that lasts milliseconds. If it's possible then it's probably only by the sort of instrumentation you find at CERN. Therefore, my approach has to break it down into simple heat transfer.
A big note here - We're getting well beyond the gnats ass at this point, I doubt any of it is significant enough to show up on a dyno test, but just as an academic exercise...
Process 1 - TBI/carburetor
air enters throttle body at ~150ish IAT
fuel injected, atomizes and vaporizes, cools charge by ~25°
125° charge moves through 200° manifold, picking up heat from what starts as a 75° temperature difference
Process 2 - port EFI
air enters throttle body at ~150ish IAT
moves through 200° manifold, picking up heat from what starts as a 50° temperature difference
fuel injected, cools charge by ~25°
Exactly how much temperature is picked up in the runner is unknown in either case, but it can be inferred that Process 1 will pick up about 50% more than Process 2 because it has 50% more temperature difference. Best case for the EFI is that the air picks up ALL the heat from the manifold and both end up hitting the port at 200, before the EFI gets the cooling and it ends up 200 vs 175 for a 5% density advantage. If the carb picks up 30 and the EFI picks up 20, then the charge ends up 155 carb vs 145 EFI - about a 3% advantage in density. Best case for the carb is that my understanding of modernish EFI is completely wrong and the intake valve closes on a mixture that hasn't fully vaporized, and that would extend to the same possibly being true in the injector argument.
Your premise makes sense, except the cooling doesn't necessarily all happen immediately at the point fuel is introduced. With port EFI more of the fuel vaporization happens after the air is in the cylinder which is too late to improve flow.
