Lots of member activity since my last update...
To clarify and reiterate what i've got going on for "extra weight" and roughly estimating weight of these items:
hard top (80-100lbs)
33/10.5r15 spare on steel rim (70lbs)
low profile rear bumper (35lbs)
stock front bumper (30lbs)
factory half doors (15lbs each)
rear tube fenders (25lbs each)
(9500lb winch with synthetic rope (90lbs this is accurate)
15psi on and off road
the long arm kit added an estimated 150-200 lbs due to DOM tubing for the links and the 1/4" and 3/8" steel brackets and cast iron flex joints on the frame end.
throwing a bunch of weight in the back to help smooth things out doesn't really work for me. steep coastal mountains and 120hp aren't a good combo hence why im trying to keep this thing light.
the main reason for starting this thread was to hopefully have a discussion about the difficulties and vast differences in suspension products available to us on the market.
when i bought this jeep it had the classic rough cuntry lift and it really did ride like an old chuckwagon. the spring rate of the 2" RC lift coils in unknown but when paired with a bilstein 5100 it rode much nicer (
@jjvw yes shocks made all the difference for that combo... but im not done yet) the excel doc found on this forum has incomplete data on RC 2" coil spring figures but from what i can find online they're somewhere between 140 and 190.
Now to update my latest findings:
Yes i splurged and went with the Fox 2.0, and yes I have noticed am improvement in ride quality. dare i say enough to leave it as is for now and let things settle in....
BUT... I'm not quite satisfied yet. As I mentioned in a previous update the front spring rate is 175 and the rear is 240. the rear does sit ever so slightly higher than the front and during my brief test run yesterday before going back to work. the rear felt like it was a bit stiffer compared to the front.
To comment on
@jjvw 's preachings on shock bias my observations have been that the shocks are sitting close to 50/50 in the front but 60/40 extended in the rear which explains the slight rake. so is it fair to say i'm getting a bit more than the 4" of advertised lift in the rear because it would seem that way.
TL;DR - swapped to a better quality shock and saw an improvement in ride quality but spring rate specs for the lift kit in question in relation to my desired ride quality is still debatable.