I won't say the risks are zero (they are not) but I will argue they are very low.
8 oz is half that of the standard green propane canister. With the system off, less than half of that is actually inside the cabin. When on, that value is even lower.
Meanwhile, a single can of computer duster has a 12oz charge of flammables. Even a 11oz can of hair spray has 4-6 oz of flammable gases. So just one can of hairspray has more flammables than would be present in the cabin at any time.
I did do the math a while back for the TJ, and in order to approach the LEL with the system running (high fan speed) and windows closed, the entire contents of the system have to leak out of the evaporator in less than 8 minutes. (Note an evaporator leak of that rate is exceptionally unlikely, especially given the evaporator is on the low pressure side.) With the vehicle stopped and no fan, it would actually exceed the UEL, but you would know something was wrong as soon as you opened the door and smelled the mercaptan.
An under-the-hood leak theoretically could ignite, but there is no confined space to create an explosion. In addition, with the CFM provided by the clutch fan unengaged at idle and the vehicle at rest, it would need to fully dump in less than 3-4 minutes to hit the LEL. At higher fan or road speeds, it would only be possible to ignite by snapping off the high pressure line with the compressor on, and even then it would be a quick flash only if it can find an ignition source in the very short time that exists before it gets diluted and blown out under the car.
For yet another comparison, a ruptured fuel line would spray out 8 oz of fuel every 5 seconds. (And you have up to 1,800 oz of fuel onboard versus just 8 oz of refrigerant...)
Another thought: In Canada, hydrocarbon refrigerants are the only ones you can legally buy for automotive ACs. Meaning every can sold in an auto parts store there is this stuff. (Yet I don't hear too much about how Canadian cars tend to explode more...)