I'm just guessing here, but probably basing it off the 392 Moab???
https://vehicles.ridefox.com/pages/jeep-commando
https://www.motortrend.com/news/202...do-392-fox-factory-vehicles-first-look-review
I'm just guessing here, but probably basing it off the 392 Moab???
It doesn't specify anything other than 392 Wrangler. Until 2025 the only model you could get the 392 in was the Rubicon. They are bringing the 392 back for 2026 as the Moab, to start off with. It's part of their plan to debut 1 Jeep a month for 12 months. Who knows what the next 11 releases will end up being.
What little I found, and I'm by no means saying if it is factual or not, is that the "Moab" won't have the 241 rock track transfer case but it will have front and rear lockers.?.?.? It will be interesting to see what they have hidden in the next 11 "crates".
https://www.jeep.com/twelve4twelve/wrangler-moab-392.html
With the 700HP option it should be fine. I’d like to see how they price that out.
With the 700HP option it should be fine. I’d like to see how they price that out.
Well , with the awesome Pentastar 3.6 V-6 standard , I can't imagine anyone wanting more engine ......![]()
It kind of works, I like it better than a typical T-bucket, but....
View attachment 655943
Anyone know if that is full AI, or just some photochoppin'?
I went looking for a pic and stumble upon this. I've been here a time or two.
View attachment 655945
When a customizing concept from one genre , doesn't quite work in a different genre.
View attachment 656121View attachment 656122
Not exactly my thing , but I find some of the old school low riders really cool.
View attachment 656128View attachment 656129
I have a problem with both of those. The first one should not be chopped. The second one is just not my flavor, but I bet @lBasket likes the spinners.![]()
