Thanks Baldwin. Is it safe to assume that they wheel in wet weather a lot in the Carolina’s?
Another one in that size that seems to bubble to the top is the Gladiator.
Yes, and wet clay.
Thanks Baldwin. Is it safe to assume that they wheel in wet weather a lot in the Carolina’s?
Another one in that size that seems to bubble to the top is the Gladiator.
From your mission statement some all terrains on the aggressive side would be fine for you?
As said before,sidewall strength is a consideration offroad with rocks,roots and branches.
Do you drive it much? Is tire noise and vibration a concern?
Maybe you want M/T's for looks like me and many others even though mud is a rare situation.
Can't go wrong with one of the American brands with a tough carcass. Buy from somewhere that has an easy no questions asked hazard warranty in case you put a hole in one.
BTW,nice looking jeep!
I deal with this struggle every time I think about tires.
Being that my LJ nowadays is mostly used for fair weather weekend ice cream runs with about 2 wheeling trips a year where I avoid mud as much as possible, I'm sure I could get by just fine with ATs and have a better driving, less noisy experience and might even enjoy wheeling a little more if the ATs gave a little more challenge. But a lifted LJ on 35s looks sooooo much better on MTs.
The Kenda RT has one a really aggressive sidewall for a non-MT. But seeing some of your pics with the thick Texas clay, MTs are probably a must.The only road use it gets is driving back and forth to the off-road rec area at 70MPH about 35 miles one way. It doesn’t do ice cream runs and if I ever take it farther from home it will be on a trailer or by tow bar.
I want MT’s for the side lugs. There is a good bit of use for them where I wheel.
Thanks for all the discussion guys!
Especially with some of the AT's and RT's these days.
The Kenda RT has one a really aggressive sidewall for a non-MT. But seeing some of your pics with the thick Texas clay, MTs are probably a must.
More questions:
My current tires are called 35” tall. Their actual height is 34.6”. It has been written by several prominent posters on this forum, that my beefed up axles will handle 35’s. If I went to tires that were slightly over 35”, like 35.6”, would this put me into a significantly more stressful load on the axles?
I always thought of Toyo’s as mid level quality
I deal with this struggle every time I think about tires.
Being that my LJ nowadays is mostly used for fair weather weekend ice cream runs with about 2 wheeling trips a year where I avoid mud as much as possible, I'm sure I could get by just fine with ATs and have a better driving, less noisy experience and might even enjoy wheeling a little more if the ATs gave a little more challenge. But a lifted LJ on 35s looks sooooo much better on MTs.
I got the 35.6 from the specification sheet for a tire of interest. The 34.6” came from the specification sheet sheet for my current tires, which are called 35’s.
