Opportunity mixed with stubborn naivety. This is no secret. Early on, it was neither a meaningful benefit nor a detriment, just different. Everything I did after the mid arm has been more valuable and has brought me into where the Savvy mid arm shows what it can do, even if someone here can't recognize that despite video evidence.See but there is an issue in the way that you approach it. You bought your mid arm on what, 2” of lift? On 32s or 33s or something? Why? Why did you get it? Did you wheel hard enough then to fix the issues you encounters by already being on a 4” and 35”s? If the savvy mid arm can be geometry corrected for greater road stability (it can be and is all the time) then why would that be looked at as the gold standard? Why not encourage people who don’t “qualify” for the mid arm in many of y’all’s eyes to get the geo correction? Why not?? What’s the harm??
The harm is not in doing it. The harm is in doing something under a false or misleading expectation of what the end result will be. I found out that Dave's geometry correction kit hops like a jumping jack in exactly a situation where geometry starts to matter. When confronted with this reality, the designer backtracks after 18 pages and says his geo correction kit is for street use. And people get mad at me? I'm not the one selling something. I'm not the one trying to gaslight you with incoherent and conflicting arguments.
Last edited:
