Pressurized
TJ Enthusiast
Might be a bit of an odd set up, but I'm thinking I might pair this rear geometry correction with a 3 link front.... Need a little research to find out whose frame brackets are preferred.
@David Kishpaugh does this. I have seen him use a Savvy truss and he has his own mid arm frame mounts but you could just use all Savvy and be good to go.Might be a bit of an odd set up, but I'm thinking I might pair this rear geometry correction with a 3 link front.... Need a little research to find out whose frame brackets are preferred.
Might be a bit of an odd set up, but I'm thinking I might pair this rear geometry correction with a 3 link front.... Need a little research to find out whose frame brackets are preferred.
@David Kishpaugh thanks again for the insight. We have talked several times about my rig, and really would like to bring it to you, but it is just not feasible right now. I know I will no get close to what your mid arm can do with my short arms, but I need to put something together that will work for 2-3 years. I have redriled the frame LCAM with the template, but did nothing with the axle LCAM as there is not much room to redrill with the Artec axle setup. Also my LCA are turned all the way in, and my pumpkin is about 1/8" away from my gas tank even though I have raised it 1.25" with my body lift.
View attachment 213676
View attachment 213677
View attachment 213678
View attachment 213679
This is how I fix the artec truss issue that are incorrectly installed. (Humor here,, not trying to put down the use of artec) I pretty much never preweld a truss on. It all gets mocked up at ride height with the proper pinion angle and stock length 13.25" control arms, or at least not exceeding 13.75" upper arm with a 15.75" lower. If memory serves, the pinion angle lands in the 17 degree area on the flange, @ 4" lift and a 97-02 belly skid, which is a high clearance on a 03-06. I will rarely pay attention to what the actual angle number is because the priority in the mock up is proper pinion angle with a fixed length arm.
I also have patterns to raise the upper links on the artec truss for those that don't have track bar/tank clearance issues.
View attachment 222573
View attachment 222574
View attachment 222575
This is how I fix the artec truss issue that are incorrectly installed. (Humor here,, not trying to put down the use of artec) I pretty much never preweld a truss on. It all gets mocked up at ride height with the proper pinion angle and stock length 13.25" control arms, or at least not exceeding 13.75" upper arm with a 15.75" lower. If memory serves, the pinion angle lands in the 17 degree area on the flange, @ 4" lift and a 97-02 belly skid, which is a high clearance on a 03-06. I will rarely pay attention to what the actual angle number is because the priority in the mock up is proper pinion angle with a fixed length arm.
I also have patterns to raise the upper links on the artec truss for those that don't have track bar/tank clearance issues.
View attachment 222573
View attachment 222574
View attachment 222575
I do not run a rear sway bar on my rig with geometry correction. in a tj without geometry correction, I'm not comfortable with the sway bar removed. It'll be a personal preference, If you can't get used to it in a couple miles, put the links back in.Do you use a swaybar with the raised roll height?
Dave has said that if you aren't going over a 10" travel shock in stock mounts or 12" if mounted outboard, there is little or nothing to gain with either a mid arm or long arm setup over the geo correction... I'm at 10's in the stock location and plan for 12's outboarded in a future mod.
Why? As we lift a TJ,
As I understand it, and why I went this way, with short arms you are limited on total travel due to bushing and control arm geometry bind, etc... About 10" travel in stock locations or 12" if outboarded. If you want to go longer travel shocks, you need to move to a mid-arm or long arm setup to allow the axle to travel with the longer shocks.Lifting a Jeep doesn't inherently change shock length. So the decision is based on shock length or lift height?
I've done a couple short arm outboards with 12s split in half. We have not seen the suspension bind on the trail. On jack stands, yes. But not with the weight of the Jeep acting on the axles.As I understand it, and why I went this way, with short arms you are limited on total travel due to bushing and control arm geometry bind, etc... About 10" travel in stock locations or 12" if outboarded. If you want to go longer travel shocks, you need to move to a mid-arm or long arm setup to allow the axle to travel with the longer shocks.
So knowing what length shock you plan to run is part of the decision process on how to build your suspension.
I've done a couple short arm outboards with 12s split in half. We have not seen the suspension bind on the trail. On jack stands, yes. But not with the weight of the Jeep acting on the axles.
Hope notMaybe the geometry correction is for is using OEM control arms?![]()
Maybe the geometry correction is for is using OEM control arms?![]()
Hope not![]()
...
Why do you hope not?
It was a joke directed at the alleged problem of short arm bindI don't think anyone is suggesting stock arms, but stock length arms tuck a 35 in the stock flair nicely.
