Are they making the stem top for the fronts again?
I don't have a clue. I rely on you and Tony Huff for current information on what shocks are available for my vehicles. However, I did edit my post to add some additional "if" words.
Are they making the stem top for the fronts again?
I don't think so. I bought a pair of eyelet adapters to bolt into the stem mount
Many have mentioned the Fox 2.0 reservoir shock and it sounds like that is my best option to have any type of tunability and rebuildability from the factory shock mounts? Is this correct? I think for the time being i will add those to the wish list but also price out the cost of going custom. This Jeep isn't my primary vehicle but i also don't want it sitting around and spending more time building it than driving it.
Another idea i had was some type of adapter. Hopefully you have success!
But you have not expressed an interest in slamming around on the Parker track either.
You can generally assume that an adapter eats up valuable space. We already don't have enough, we don't need to fuck that up.
My thought process was that I would rather have 8.5" of well tuned quality travel than 9" of crappy off the shelf travel, as an example.
At some point you will have to either slow down, accept the abuse, destroy the suspension or some combination thereof
So yet again, Chad was not correct. That said, slowing down is very cheap.For example, slowing down is gross.
DO NOT USE THE ALUMINUM BODY REMOTE RESERVOIR SHOCKS. ONLY USE THE STEEL BODY VERSIONS.Will you elaborate?
When sticking with the OEM mounts, everything is a tradeoff. Is the ability to use a quality shock worth a loss of 1/2" in travel? I figured quality is better than quantity. My thought process was that I would rather have 8.5" of well tuned quality travel than 9" of crappy off the shelf travel, as an example. Perhaps that's not a reasonable way to think of it.
It is reasonable if those numbers work, do they?
slowing down is very cheap
I also don't know if I can compare the lengths apples to apples...for example my rear upper mount is inverted with the bar pin above the crossmember, not sure I can get away with that with a Fox
I didn't tell you to slow down, I just said that going fast costs a lot of money.Of course the guy selling brakes is telling us to slow down. You capitalist! lol
This is another bit of interest to me. Small adjustments guys have made to squeeze every inch out of the stock mounts. I started researching travel lengths and bias and seeing configurations from guys here on the forum. Heres a link to a thread i was reading up on, https://wranglertjforum.com/threads/how-much-up-travel-do-you-have.44250/
If it wasn't clear, you can make a shorter shock work. The limit may be how much abuse you can endure since the tune will have to be pretty stiff to slow down bottoming out and how much the shock is tearing up the mount(s) or itself/themselves. If the shock can't dampen the event, the extra force gets transferred into the chassis at much higher levels. At some point you will have to either slow down, accept the abuse, destroy the suspension or some combination thereof.
...
This is another bit of interest to me. Small adjustments guys have made to squeeze every inch out of the stock mounts. I started researching travel lengths and bias and seeing configurations from guys here on the forum. Heres a link to a thread i was reading up on, https://wranglertjforum.com/threads/how-much-up-travel-do-you-have.44250/
So is this why the active bump stops have become more and more prevalent in builds? (mainly on the JK and up generations) So you can accept the softer tune in a stock length, but allow the slow down before you hit bottom?
It is an educationally valuable exercise to the extent that it made building the outboard mounts that much easier to understand.
Lol... so the Poly shock towers are the recommended flavor?I will have to do more digging into my current setup, but this thread has helped tell me where i will need to go for more fun.
The current config is what was on it when I bought it, I want to go through and swap springs, shocks, and control arms since I'm currently on 2" of lift and stock arms all around. I have no real investment into the current setup so I still have time to choose my lane, so to speak. I think for what i like doing, I'm gonna need a different shock tower. Not a real way of getting around that.
Yes and no. Lots of folks run them even on longer travel shocks because their builder or shock guy tells them to. What they are supposed to do is add a short but high level amount of damping to the uppermost limit of travel to help the valving in the shock slow the shaft speed down in a very short distance. Lots of tuning involved to dial that in.So is this why the active bump stops have become more and more prevalent in builds? (mainly on the JK and up generations) So you can accept the softer tune in a stock length, but allow the slow down before you hit bottom?
