Novak Conversions Jeep Wrangler TJ engine mounts

Car pics too cool not to share

Oversteer is definitely a thing. Snap oversteer isn't, really, it's just a way of deferring responsibility for holes in one's driving skill set. ;)

1766287315212.png

264,692,574,195 drivers can't be wrong
 
So, as cool as that is (and it is!), I wonder what would happen if it picked up any kind of road debris? I have to believe that they've made allowances for such an occurrence, but I do wonder what that might be.

That was one of my thoughts, too. They couldn't run that on salt for that reason, it would simply destroy the surface. I imagine paved surfaces, especially asphalt, are susceptible to "donating" debris when that vacuum rolls over it. Pavement and concrete are great in compression, tensile, not so much.
 
Wow that's rude

I knew that was coming. :D

I have no attachment or much knowledge of either car and their crowd, so forgive me, but is the MR2 and Fiero kind of a kissing cousins situation where both understand they're very much alike, but don't want anyone to know, at least not publically? :unsure: Like maybe @lBasket also has a Fiero, but he just doesn't talk about it?
 
I have no attachment or much knowledge of either car and their crowd, so forgive me, but is the MR2 and Fiero kind of a kissing cousins situation where both understand they're very much alike, but don't want anyone to know, at least not publically? :unsure: Like maybe @lBasket also has a Fiero, but he just doesn't talk about it?

Other than compact, two seat, mid/mid-rear engine, I don't think there was any direct relationship between the two.

I think the MR2 is a car that was very good and realized its potential. On the other hand, I think the Fiero had potential to be a very good car that was never realized, for numerous reasons.

I found the early versions (like the photo above) to be pretty sharp looking for the time.
 
That MR2 reminds me of the Pontiac Fiero.
View attachment 661794

I have no attachment or much knowledge of either car and their crowd, so forgive me, but is the MR2 and Fiero kind of a kissing cousins situation where both understand they're very much alike, but don't want anyone to know, at least not publically? :unsure: Like maybe @lBasket also has a Fiero, but he just doesn't talk about it?

Other than compact, two seat, mid/mid-rear engine, I don't think there was any direct relationship between the two.

I think the MR2 is a car that was very good and realized its potential. On the other hand, I think the Fiero had potential to be a very good car that was never realized, for numerous reasons.

I found the early versions (like the photo above) to be pretty sharp looking for the time.

My Uncle worked at a Pontiac dealership when these were released in '84. There initially was a fair amount of excitement surrounding them, as at the time, the only other American-made 2-seat "sports cars" (and I'm using that term rather generously, here) were the Corvette, and the
Ford EXP Sports Coupe/Mercury LN7 twins. Fiero was the only rear/mid-engined of the bunch, and also had some weird composite body panels that were easily replaceable. My uncle used to have some literature that showed the car stripped down to its skeleton. All in all, it was a neat little car for its time.

Myself, I prefer the refreshed 1986-'88 GT version.
1766343389984.png

1766343431582.png
 
Other than compact, two seat, mid/mid-rear engine, I don't think there was any direct relationship between the two.

I think the MR2 is a car that was very good and realized its potential. On the other hand, I think the Fiero had potential to be a very good car that was never realized, for numerous reasons.

I found the early versions (like the photo above) to be pretty sharp looking for the time.

I like the factory MR2 better, but you see way more Fieros with a V8 than MR2s. I'd take a Fiero with a LS.
 
I like the factory MR2 better, but you see way more Fieros with a V8 than MR2s. I'd take a Fiero with a LS.

I'd take a Yenko Corvair "Stinger" over either of the two, thank you very much! ;)

1766343755422.png
1766343785480.png
1766343802965.png
1766343828067.png


Actually, I'd take any '65-'69 Corvair over the Fiero or the MR2, even in the 4-door hardtop flavor. But that's just me...;)
1766343975657.png
1766344009625.png
 
Everytime I see an Opel Gt, I think baby C3 Vette.

Around 1982/'83, there was a fella in Saratoga Springs, New York that owned a body shop, an Opel GT, and a Jeep Commando (Jeepster). He married the Opel's body to the Jeepster's floor pan, and radiused the wheel arches to a larger opening to allow for larger tires. The final result was nice enough to allow him to splash a beautiful black paint job on it. I don't know how long he drove it, but he eventually traded it straight across for a newer Corvette that wasn't more than a couple of years old. I remember seeing the Opel/Jeep at his shop, and if you didn't know that Opel never built a GT in 4WD, you never would've known that it wasn't a factory-built car. So sharp!
 
Novak Conversions Jeep Wrangler TJ engine mounts