That depends on what purpose the Jeep plays. For some it’s off-road others for camping and yet others is just a daily driver with few mods. There are so many different roles a TJ plays that one build design is t right for everyone.Because a TJ on 35's can do wonders and looks just about perfect. That's subjective but something most won't debate
Not fair... you had the giraffe to weigh you down
jk
I did all the wonders on 33's that people did at Moab on 35's and 37's. Never had a problem, never bounced like in the video. I've done the same round here in N ID where most run 37's on TJ's. I do agree 35's look good, the 33's look good too.Because a TJ on 35's can do wonders and looks just about perfect. That's subjective but something most won't debate
This is the other likely suspect in the discussion. I wish I'd taken that line so I had a video of what happened on 33's without a midarm or Dave's geometry correction bracket. I suspect I know though.Not fair... you had the giraffe to weigh you down
on a more serious note, do you think garrets jeep wouldnt have hopped as much if he had a front correction too?
No. The weight is on the rear axle. The front end is only along for the ride.
Garrets bucks forward and back while yours stays planted, is the lifting front end due to the rear loosing and gaining traction(hopping) and when it grips up it pulls up the front end causing the front hop? Is this why?
I still don’t understand this. Maybe explain it a little more but why is a front locker so useful if all the weight is on the rear
I would have gone straight up without any wheel hop.I think we'd be hopping all over
The front end isn’t trying to walk under the rig like the rear is trying to do?
@Brandough made that climb in a short arm lifted TJ. He had some momentum and was on the throttle but I can’t remember how much wheel hop there was. Maybe someone has a video of it. Dino made that climb in his midarm LJ too.
Same here, I was really impressed with how my rig performed on 33s and unlocked, this trip has really bade me enjoy staying on 33s, and I dont really plan on 35s anytime soon. Only problem is that 33s work until they dont. Some places you really do need 35s to not be crashing into everything. Especially the places where I like to wheelI did all the wonders on 33's that people did at Moab on 35's and 37's. Never had a problem, never bounced like in the video. I've done the same round here in N ID where most run 37's on TJ's. I do agree 35's look good, the 33's look good too.
I have a stock TJ on 31"s that will do things that most people feel are wonders but it won't come close to what my TJ on 35's can do.I did all the wonders on 33's that people did at Moab on 35's and 37's. Never had a problem, never bounced like in the video. I've done the same round here in N ID where most run 37's on TJ's. I do agree 35's look good, the 33's look good too.
I think there are too many variables to simply try it in another rig. Shocks, weight and gearing play a large role too.
I promise, you would have hopped on this one lol. Ask @taylormade73 who hopped even in his LJ doing the same line. It’s the large bumps in the middle of it that get you hopping.I did all the wonders on 33's that people did at Moab on 35's and 37's. Never had a problem, never bounced like in the video. I've done the same round here in N ID where most run 37's on TJ's. I do agree 35's look good, the 33's look good too.
