I really still don't see the point of FWD - I've always thought that it was a cheap way to get "decent" handling that would take more money to achieve with a RWD. Is my thinking flawed?
There is the slight benefit of understeer instead of oversteer for people that can't drive in snow, but otherwise it's 100% about cost. Get rid of a driveshaft, then once the rear suspension doesn't have to transmit drive torque, it can be made out of toothpicks, while integrating the differential into the transmission housing saves further cost vs separate boxes.
To me there is zero benefit and any FWD vehicle to me never surpasses being thought of as an appliance.
Last edited:
