A sign of the times

I don't know that it would be possible to "make a law." Legislating morality does not generally work. There are two issue that come to mind with your question:

First, a society generally holds a collective moral standard. e.g., 50, 25, probably even 10 years ago in western society culture, this kind of corruption would not have shown its face. Did it happen? Maybe, though I doubt to that degree. But it was not something that a woman or her betrothed would have flaunted like this.

That leads to the second issue. This, I would say, is a bellwether to where things are headed. With this kind of debauched behavior becoming acceptable, it will eventually be considered within the bounds of normal behavior, and a society built on this kind of debauchery cannot long sustain itself. History proves this.

The solution lies not in legislation, but it a moral and spiritual renewal wherein society once again puts value on things like modesty, decency, family, protecting women and children from predatory behavior - their own self-predatory behavior as well as that of others. This cuckhold of a "finacée" (the word loosely used) has failed in his duty as a husband even before betrothing the woman. He has let her be used as sex toy and a whore by a host of men.

I recently had to essentially rescue a woman very close to me from an attempt at being sex trafficked. She was blind to what was being done to her. I stepped in and intervened. Had I not, she would, by now, be locked in some filthy room somewhere, drugged up and being abused multiple times a day by numerous men. This is what men do for the women around them. They do NOT stand by and egg them on as they are used and abused by other men. Men (actual, real men, not just some dufus who happens to have XY chromosomes) take the lead and care for and protect. This jerk did not.

If this is where we are headed as a society (and I believe that this is truly a bellwether), then we are done.

Gang bangs for viewing and entertainment are not new and long predate the internet, video, film and printing press. Consent and exploitation have always existed and have always existed on an uncomfortable continuum. The only difference between modern and ancient debauchery is the ease of access.
 
I guess I'm living in a vacuum, because I see all these OnlyFans whores raking in huge amounts of cash and I can only think "How?"

I work in IT. Porn is FREE on the internet. It's EVERYWHERE. Especially on the laptops of the sales teams.

Why would some simp PAY to see a naked girl?

My only guess is that they have failed at the internet.

Here is where you and so many others (OF "creators" included) are being lied to.

The average "creator" on OF brings in less than $200 a month. The few top earners actually bring in the vast majority of earnings. According to this report, 1/3 of the money earned on OF is earned by 1% of the "creators." (I keep putting "creators" in quotes because I'd prefer to use different verbiage.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyd and RangerTJ
Even there, the problem is not smartphones, but the lack of discipline and parental responsibility.

Alcohol is not a problem. Abuse of alcohol is the problem.

Guns are not the problem. Murderous intent in the human heart is the problem.

Automobiles are not the problem. Irresponsible drivers are the problem.

Sex is not the problem. A complete lack of understanding of what it means to be human is the problem.

And we have eons of history behind us where each and every one of those points is a moving target when trying to identify where the moral and immoral is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zorba
“Be safe” he says, as if she can verify the backgrounds, mentality, and medical history of 583 men prior to this event? I am in disbelief of, well, everything.

She ended up in hospital after and because of the stunt. All moral and ethical matters aside, even the physicality of doing this rebelled against it. That should tell us something. Even if it isn´t immoral, it just damned stupid; and stupid is only cheered on by the stupid.
 
Here is where you and so many others (OF "creators" included) are being lied to.

The average "creator" on OF brings in less than $200 a month. The few top earners actually bring in the vast majority of earnings. According to this report, 1/3 of the money earned on OF is earned by 1% of the "creators." (I keep putting "creators" in quotes because I'd prefer to use different verbiage.)

So it's a porn lottery.

Millions put money in but only a few get money out.

Which means that it's only a matter time before a politician figures out a way to tax it.

For the girl taking 500+ guys in a few hours, I wonder if they'd tax her for grand total of feet inserted?

Penalty for early withdrawal?

Environmental clean up expenses?

Her profits would wither like number 583 when he sees what he's about to "experience".

She ended up in hospital after and because of the stunt. All moral and ethical matters aside, even the physicality of doing this rebelled against it. That should tell us something. Even if it isn´t immoral, it just damned stupid; and stupid is only cheered on by the stupid.

I wonder if her profits covered the medical bill.

Who is gonna insure that thing?
 
I don’t have too. My children don’t have them, nor would I allow them to.

For better or for worse, there will be a day when your children will suddenly have access to a massive repository of content and information. And there is nothing you can do about it when it happens.
 
Here is where you and so many others (OF "creators" included) are being lied to.

The average "creator" on OF brings in less than $200 a month. The few top earners actually bring in the vast majority of earnings. According to this report, 1/3 of the money earned on OF is earned by 1% of the "creators." (I keep putting "creators" in quotes because I'd prefer to use different verbiage.)

I’d like to know if the numbers the top 1% make are before or after fees to the platform.

Such as the girl who brags about bringing in $250k/month is that the check that goes in the bank account?
 
For better or for worse, there will be a day when your children will suddenly have access to a massive repository of content and information. And there is nothing you can do about it when it happens.

Really? Damn...I'd never thought of that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColoJeep
And we have eons of history behind us where each and every one of those points is a moving target when trying to identify where the moral and immoral is.

The wise learn from history and avoid the same mistakes. No so much the foolish.

Proverbs 27:12 — A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself; but the simple pass on, and are punished.
 
The wise learn from history and avoid the same mistakes. No so much the foolish.

Proverbs 27:12 — A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself; but the simple pass on, and are punished.


The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty.

Interesting how a different translation changes it from moral judgement to common sense wisdom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyd
I am no fan of any kind of sportsball. I think that people paying outrageous prices to earn a seat in stadium to watch grown men chase a ball around a field is the epitome of stupid, as is crowding around a television set to cheer them on from a distance; however, I fail to see a direct parallel here.

Two people do something for some amount of pleasure and entertainment money, and need medical care because of it. One is more socially acceptable than the other is.
 
Even there, the problem is not smartphones, but the lack of discipline and parental responsibility.
My main dislike of smartphones actually doesn't arise from all the bullshit that they engender - that's just the frosting on the cake. Its primarily because I see them as a completely pointless waste of my time and money. And that would be fine, except everyone EXPECTS me to participate in this lunacy, which I refuse to do. The cost to society for catering to these damn things is massive, yet I don't GAS except when it becomes an expectation that I'm supposed to participate. Someone wants to put up with the hideous cost and royal pain in the ass these things are, that's on them. Your life is all about the PHOOOOOONNE - that's on you - just don't expect me to share your delusion, and FFS don't inconvenience me with your crippled "device". I didn't need one in 1978, I sure as hell don't need one now.
 
She ended up in hospital after and because of the stunt. All moral and ethical matters aside, even the physicality of doing this rebelled against it. That should tell us something. Even if it isn´t immoral, it just damned stupid; and stupid is only cheered on by the stupid.

Stupid? Of course she is! But its NOMB, so I don't care.