Exactly. Not just cars either, damn near everything.
Yep, planned obsolescence.
Exactly. Not just cars either, damn near everything.
Some of the used EVs are rather affordable—the cheapest Model 3 is just $20,125. A long-range Model Y will cost a fair bit more than that, although even here, the most expensive one for sale by Hertz is just $38,116. As a reminder, there is now a tax credit of up to $4,000 available when buying a used EV that costs less than $25,000, assuming one meets the income caps.
But they are all ex-rental cars, and that means most of these cars have had relatively hard lives and now have plenty of miles on them—the cheaper Model 3s are all closing in on 100,000 miles. Not all of them, though—in New Orleans, there's a Kia EV6 up for sale with just under 5,000 miles.
Available cars can be found in Hertz's Rent2Buy portal, which have been listed for as low as $17,800 according to a screenshot published on Electrek. Accounting for the $4,000 federal tax credit available for used EVs, that takes the net cost down to $13,800. The cheapest cars depicted have already sold, so the lowest we found at time of publication was $20,500. Still, that's just $16,500 accounting for the tax credit.
No matter how you slice it, that's a strong value proposition for EV buyers. Sure, they're former rentals, meaning they'll have been mistreated by everyone who has touched them. And because they're Teslas, their interiors are Tupperware, repairs are expensive, and driving one will make your fellow motorists think you're into The Joe Rogan Experience and dubious supplements.
Still, from what we've seen of Teslas in commercial use, even constant fast-charging won't ruin a battery until you're nearing 200,000 miles. Your regular user will likely get a much longer lifespan out of theirs, and won't have to worry about an imminent $16,000 replacement. Considering the range, the price, and the access to the Supercharger network, it's hard not to see these Hertz Teslas as solid buys for those ready for an EV.
Exactly. Not just cars either, damn near everything.
And soon it will be everything, they're funneling us towards 'subscription plans' for all consumer goods possible, all part of the overarching plan:
View attachment 490569
That's right. The smartphone model is being applied everywhere. I refuse to participate.
Don't be dense. I'm not that stupid, and neither are you.Shouldnt we call it the electricity model??
Electricity monthly service fees for over a century?
Oh damn wait…..I forgot about water
Hell that goes back to the Roman Empire
That's right. The smartphone model is being applied everywhere. I refuse to participate.
I don’t really see how it’s the ‘smartphone model’ either, they didn’t invent monthly service charges, subscription plans, or built in obsolescence, they all looooong predated smartphones.
I think their biggest sin really is guilt by association in that they’ve become a portable conduit to social media which is apparently addictive to the level of insanity. People walk around staring at their phones largely to reply to or reading replies from others, taking selfies to post on social media, making videos to post, and so forth. Social media has killed real social interaction, and, given voice to the criminally insane among us that used to be relegated to standing on street corners yelling at clouds.
The device itself is nothing more than a tool, an inanimate object, incapable of being ‘good’ or ‘evil’, it takes a human actor to add one of those.
Not unlike a gun.
First came Social Media, now the earth is flat…
’Nuff said.
True enough - BUT - the smartphone accelerated the phenomenon to trans-warp speed. The TelCos have gotten people used to paying outrageous prices for a sub-optimal (at best) device - and replacing it every 2 or 3 years. Now that has spread everywhere, because idiots will pay hard earned money for pseudo-"services", like enabling heated seats on cars, or whatever. Expensive mobile data plans, etc, etc.I don’t really see how it’s the ‘smartphone model’ either, they didn’t invent monthly service charges, subscription plans, or built in obsolescence, they all looooong predated smartphones.
"Social Media" is the great evil of our time - coupled with its smartphone delivery system its a Goebbels wet dream. Even though some of such sites are available through computers, the smartphone has multiplied the downsides exponentially - something I frankly don't understand, but I don't understand "Social Media" either (No, I don't count forums as "Social Media", I wouldn't so insult one).I think their biggest sin really is guilt by association in that they’ve become a portable conduit to social media which is apparently addictive to the level of insanity. People walk around staring at their phones largely to reply to or reading replies from others, taking selfies to post on social media, making videos to post, and so forth. Social media has killed real social interaction, and, given voice to the criminally insane among us that used to be relegated to standing on street corners yelling at clouds.
The difference is a gun is a single purpose device that does one thing - fire bullets - very well. Its not a jack of all trades, master of none that does nothing particularly well - except extract money from its owner. With that said, it does indeed take a "human actor" - I've never understood the fanaticism surrounding both smartphones as well as "social media". A quote I found recently:The device itself is nothing more than a tool, an inanimate object, incapable of being ‘good’ or ‘evil’, it takes a human actor to add one of those.
Not unlike a gun.
I hadn't thought of this until I encountered this quote - although I had noticed it in reference to "Social Media" - but the guy is dead nuts correct. Criticize or abstain from either, and the fundamentalist apologetics will bombard you from all sides. I've said for years that Zuckerberg has QUITE the product - dare to criticize it and the apologists will come screaming out of the woodwork!"I have been surprised by the almost visceral response some people have when they discover I don't own a smartphone. Some even take it as a personal affront. It registers as a challenge to the myth of inevitability, the myth that one needs a smartphone to thrive in contemporary society."The article continues: "I can only conclude that I have scratched the skin of a technological fundamentalism that,like other fundamentalisms, wishes to monopolize a whole society, and, therefore, cannot tolerate the smallestdifference of opinion."
trans-warp speed.
It's always about the trans.
True enough - BUT - the smartphone accelerated the phenomenon to trans-warp speed. The TelCos have gotten people used to paying outrageous prices for a sub-optimal (at best) device - and replacing it every 2 or 3 years. Now that has spread everywhere, because idiots will pay hard earned money for pseudo-"services", like enabling heated seats on cars, or whatever. Expensive mobile data plans, etc, etc.
"Social Media" is the great evil of our time - coupled with its smartphone delivery system its a Goebbels wet dream. Even though some of such sites are available through computers, the smartphone has multiplied the downsides exponentially - something I frankly don't understand, but I don't understand "Social Media" either (No, I don't count forums as "Social Media", I wouldn't so insult one).
The difference is a gun is a single purpose device that does one thing - fire bullets - very well. Its not a jack of all trades, master of none that does nothing particularly well - except extract money from its owner. With that said, it does indeed take a "human actor" - I've never understood the fanaticism surrounding both smartphones as well as "social media". A quote I found recently:
I hadn't thought of this until I encountered this quote - although I had noticed it in reference to "Social Media" - but the guy is dead nuts correct. Criticize or abstain from either, and the fundamentalist apologetics will bombard you from all sides. I've said for years that Zuckerberg has QUITE the product - dare to criticize it and the apologists will come screaming out of the woodwork!
When the iPhone was introduced in 2007, I examined the concept like I do all new tech. What it looked like to me was that the failed Newton PDA had been grafted onto a cell phone. Not necessarily a bad idea, if one wants/needs a PDA. However, I skipped the whole PDA craze as I didn't need one, although I thought they had their place. But at the price that the iPhone commanded, it was a complete non-starter with me. I didn't need it and I was certainly not paying the price demanded. Having dismissed the iPhone as something I wasn't interested in, I promptly forgot the thing's existence. Smartphones just weren't in my world, I'd see them on occasion, but never gave them much thought one way or another. Whatever - I didn't care...
... until about 2016, when the smartphone culture abruptly came to my cognizance. I had pulled my flip out for whatever reason in a meeting at work, and a co-worker had a comment. "You call THAT a phone?". Thus, I was introduced to "smartphone expectation", which was new to me! That was my first realization that it's all about the PHOOOOOONNE!!!
I was listening to Kudlow on Fox Business (magic radio) he was talking about EVs. He said dealerships have EVs collecting dust in their lots, people don't even want to rent them.
The government is pushing car makers to continue to make a product for the most part very few want.
Now on the subject of subscriptions, Nissan wants me to pay them 8 bucks a month so I can remote start my car. F*** that. They should remove the remote start system that I paid for and give me back the money.
Now on the subject of subscriptions, Nissan wants me to pay them 8 bucks a month so I can remote start my car. F*** that. They should remove the remote start system that I paid for and give me back the money.
I assume that’s to remote start with an app? Can you remote start with a key fob?
